Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Study & Research - Global DDoS Threat Landscape Report
Study & Research

Global DDoS Threat Landscape Report

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamNovember 16, 20154 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks are a constantly evolving menace that threaten online businesses with downed websites, financial losses and damaged client relationships. As perpetrators continue to adopt new technologies and methods to execute attacks, the need for organizations to stay informed and up-to-date with the latest trends in online security has never been greater.

Our latest DDoS Threat Landscape report reviews the changes in DDoS attack patterns in Q3 2015. The report was compiled using data from 7,752 network and application layer assaults mitigated by Imperva Incapsula in Q3 2015.

The third quarter was notable for a number of reasons, not least of which was the high number of attacks targeting clients in our network during this period.

On average we mitigated 129 DDoS attacks every day, representing a steep 116 percent increase from the previous quarter. Additionally, the changes in attack tactics we witnessed point to new threats of which every online entity should be aware.

Key Findings

Looking back at Q3 2015, we can identify several clear patterns that defined this time period in DDoS mitigation, including:

  • 100+ Gbps attacks became commonplace: A 100+ Gbps network layer attack was mitigated once every other day, with the largest one peaking at 260 Gbps. The largest application layer attack peaked at 268,800 requests per second.

network-layer-ddos-q3-2015

  • China cemented its status as top attacking country: 37.5 percent of DDoS botnet traffic originated in China, making it by far the leading source country of attacks worldwide.
  • Attackers focused fire on US and APAC hosted websites: US hosted websites were targeted by 45.8 percent of DDoS botnet traffic, making them the most attacked worldwide. APAC hosted websites were on the receiving end of 40.7 percent of botnet traffic.
  • The increased sophistication of multi vector attacks: While the number of multi-vector attacks decreased from 44 percent in the second quarter, they increased in sophistication, with eight and nine vector assaults taking place.

network-layer-ddos-vectors-q3-2015

  • The resurgence of Baidu impersonators: After a huge decrease in Q2 2015, there was a resurgence in Baidu bot impersonators, most likely due to the increase in DDoS attacks out of China.
  • Attacks grew shorter:The duration of network layer attacks was markedly down, with only four percent lasting more than three hours. Still, the longest one lasted for 31 days. The longest application layer attack lasted more than 20 days.

Unprecedented Spike in Attack Numbers

The most prevalent trend we saw in Q3 2015, was the unprecedented spike in the number of network and application layer DDoS attacks, both increasing by more than 100 percent, compared to the previous quarter.

At the same time, there was a marked decrease in the duration of network layer assaults. This can be taken as a sign of the increased use of DDoS-for-hire services (a.k.a., streesers or booters), as they typically only offer limited access to their botnet resources.

For certain time frames, application layer attacks actually increased in duration, as evidenced by the 14.6 percent of attacks that lasted longer than 12 hours; the figure is up from 6.2 percent in the second quarter.application-layer-ddos-duraion-q3-2015Additionally, there was a significantly higher target distribution among Imperva Incapsula clients, with a much higher percentage of websites being targeted by DDoS attacks. This is a potentially worrying trend going into the final quarter of 2015.

Methodology

Our analysis is based on DDoS data collected from 2,732 network layer and 5,020 application layer attacks on websites using Incapsula services from July 1 through August 29 of this year, referred to as Q3 or the third quarter.

Information about DDoS bot capabilities and assumed identities comes from a random sample of 4.34 billion bot sessions collected from such assaults over the same period.

Data from Q2, or the second quarter, is taken from 1,572 network layer and 2,714 application layer attacks on websites using Incapsula services from March 1, 2015 to May 7, 2015.[su_box title=”About Imperva®” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″]ImpervaImperva® (NYSE:IMPV), is a leading provider of cyber security solutions that protect business-critical data and applications. The company’s SecureSphere, Incapsula and Skyfence product lines enable organizations to discover assets and risks, protect information wherever it lives – in the cloud and on-premises – and comply with regulations. The Imperva Application Defense Center, a research team comprised of some of the world’s leading experts in data and application security, continually enhances Imperva products with up-to-the-minute threat intelligence, and publishes reports that provide insight and guidance on the latest threats and how to mitigate them. Imperva is headquartered in Redwood Shores, California.[/su_box]

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Exploited Faster, Patched Slower: Verizon DBIR 2026 Shows Security Teams Losing Ground

May 20, 20265 Mins Read

Security’s Blind Spot: The Threats Hiding in “Low-Severity” Alerts

May 6, 20265 Mins Read

AppSec is dead, long live AI security

April 29, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}