Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Google’s Move to Strict DMARC Implementation
Articles

Google’s Move to Strict DMARC Implementation

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamNovember 5, 2015Updated:July 4, 20242 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Google’s Move to Strict DMARC Implementation
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Google recently announced that they are stepping up their commitment to DMARC. Starting in June 2016 gmail.com will reject any messages that don’t pass the authentication checks spelled out in the DMARC specification.

Google’s adoption of DMARC is a huge step in right direction for global DMARC deployment and a mark of stability in DMARC in general. While Yahoo previously announced this same policy, having Google, as the largest email provider in the world, moving to “reject” is a huge endorsement.

What does this mean for financial services and other companies, looking to ensure they are not adversely affected by these changes? Based on our experience helping customers fully deploy DMARC on the sender side, combined with recommendations from BITS (The Financial Services Roundtable), here are the five steps we recommend, to make sure your organization is DMARC ready before these changes take place.

  1. Audit: Create an inventory of your organization’s email domains, email streams, and email types, including all domains actively sending email as well as inactive domains registered for defensive or brand protection purposes. Active domains can contain multiple email streams originating from different groups or vendors. DMARC-provided data and/or the Trusted Email Registry can augment in-house research and reduce the cost of discovering email streams.
  2. Detect: Compare and contrast real-world data against your stated email authentication implementation strategy.
  3. Remediate: Resolve any email authentication implementation issues or operational issues uncovered during the Audit or Detect phases.
  4. Secure: Implement blocking policies for both active and inactive domains. Publishing a blocking policy allows participating ISPs to either quarantine or reject unauthenticated email on your behalf.
  5. Monitor: Continue to look for new signs of abuse, operational issues, changes in network topology, and other anomalies. Aggressively pursue takedowns to gain a reputation for being a ‘hard target’.

DMARC is a useful authentication standard, that will help reduce the amount of spam delivered worldwide. While many organizations have been dragging their feet on adoption, Google’s move to a strict reject policy means that no company wanting to communicate with their clients can continue to ignore it.[su_box title=”Daniel Ingevaldson, CTO, EasySolution” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″]daniel ingevaldsonWith over 15 years of experience protecting some of the world’s biggest organizations from next-generation threats, Daniel is our guru when it comes to developing fresh approaches to online security and fraud. As our CTO, he defines and executes the strategies for researching and creating the next phase of Total Fraud Protection® products.[/su_box]

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Decoding Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

March 28, 202411 Mins Read

Master Cloud Compliance Tools: Achieve Regulatory Success

March 28, 202411 Mins Read

Enhance Your Digital Crime and Security Practices Today

March 28, 20249 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}