Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - HIPAA Violations – Remediation is Always More Expensive Than Prevention
Articles

HIPAA Violations – Remediation is Always More Expensive Than Prevention

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamJune 5, 2014Updated:July 3, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
privacy
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

The year is circa 1995; Major League Baseball players end a 232-day strike, Windows 95 is released by Microsoft, JavaScript is first introduced and deployed, the Grateful Dead announce their break-up, and Toy Story became the first ever wholly computer generated movie to be released. Did you also know that in 1995 the average inpatient medical record was accessed and viewed by at least 150 people during a typical five-day hospital stay by nursing staff, to receptionists to x-ray technicians?

Think about this; 150 viewers in 1995! That number has to have quadrupled since then to at least 600 health professionals today with health information exchanges, business associates, and electronic health records (EHI/EPHI) being the healthcare industry norm. Furthermore, there is no end in sight as the number of record viewers continues to grow as medical coders, medical billers, insurance companies, and even quality control personnel all require access to medical patient information of some degree in order to conduct their day-to-day work associated with healthcare payment and operations. To be honest; these are only just a few of the many legitimate reasons around why a patient’s medical records are viewed and in that same light why a patient’s medical information could become part of an information breach.

Securing, protecting, and ensuring health information is private has become an ever increasing challenge with fiscal penalties for failure increasing almost at the same rate EHI and EPHI data is expanding. Adherence to HIPAA must not be focused solely on a “point-in-time” that aligns with the organizations audit and compliance review cycle. Therefore, Healthcare organizations must embrace HIPAA as an on-going, full-time effort that requires a combined program of resources and compliance tools to ensure success. This allows institutions to avoid penalties and remediation costs that aren’t budgeted for.

For example: on the black market a stolen social security card costs one dollar while a stolen medical record is worth $50. Healthcare information is ripe for an information breach due to the fact that it allows a fraudster the ability to take over the victim’s identity in its entirety.

Let’s look at some recent HIPAA violations that have materialized in fines:

– CIGNET → fine: $4,300,000
– Concentra → fine: $1,725,220
– Alaska Department of Health and Human Services → fine: $1,700,000
– WellPoint → fine: $1,700,000
– Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee → fine: $1,500,000
– Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Massachusetts
– Eye and Ear Associates →
fine: $1,500,000
– Affinity Health Plan → fine: $1,215,780
– South Shore Hospital → fine: $750,000
– Idaho State University → fine: $400,000
– Shasta Regional Medical Center → fine: $275,000
– Phoenix Cardiac Surgery → fine: $100,000
– The Hospice of Northern Idaho → fine: $50,000

Source: U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services (HHS), Case Examples and Resolution Agreements

Below is a slide I recently developed that demonstrates the costs of remediation to an organization that experiences a breach:

data_picture

The digital age is driving new restrictions on using Personal Health Information (PHI) within Healthcare organizations. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius recently emphasized that “…much has changed in healthcare since HIPAA was enacted over 15 years ago…” and that the “…new rules associated with PHI/EPHI data will help protect patient privacy and safeguard patients’ health information in an ever-expanding digital age”.

Prevention is still the best approach for reducing the risk of information breach and ensuring your organization is HIPAA compliant. The human error factor of security breaches can only truly be solved through educating and re-educating time and time again the organizational resources that interact with sensitive data aligned with HIPAA. Prevention at its core isn’t a one and done concept; it must become part of your organizations DNA.

By Kyle Kennedy

Kyle KennedyKyle Kennedy is STEALTHbits Technologies’ Chief Technology Officer. With nearly 20 years of experience in the Information Technology field, over a decade of which he focused on Enterprise Security Architecture, Identity & Access Management, and Business Process Management, Kyle has been able to lead large, complex organizations by efficiently mapping business processes to technology solutions. As the former Vice President of Business Development at Pontis Research and Global Director – Directory Services, Identity Services and Enterprise Security Architecture in the Corporate Information Technology organization at ADP, Kyle brings personal, real-world experience in facing the challenges STEALTHbits’ customers encounter daily and the knowledge of how to navigate the hurdles that present themselves along the way. Kyle holds a Bachelor’s degree in Sociology from California State University, Hayward, and a Masters of Business Administration degree from Kaplan University. Kyle is also completing his Masters of Homeland Security and Emergency Management degree.

 

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

December 18, 20255 Mins Read

What Happens When Devices Cross Borders? The Role of Geofencing in Global IT

August 7, 20256 Mins Read

The Evolving Importance of Identity Governance in FinTech

July 10, 20258 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}