Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Injection Attacks are no. 1 Target and Twice as Likely to Happen in the UK
Articles

Injection Attacks are no. 1 Target and Twice as Likely to Happen in the UK

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamJune 25, 2015Updated:July 8, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Injection attacks
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Around 60 per cent of all web application attacks in the UK are SQL injection attacks, making them the number one target for attackers. This is according to the latest 2015 Global Threat Intelligence Report (GTIR) announced by NTT Com Security, the global information security and risk management company.

Analysing over six billion attacks in 2014, the GTIR reveals that injection attacks – a code injection technique designed to attack data-driven applications – are twice as likely to happen in the UK as they are anywhere else in the world. The total figure for injection attacks across all countries was 26 per cent, with the UK topping the table at 58 per cent alongside Norway. By comparison, the US and Sweden were 19 per cent, France and Germany 12 per cent, and the Netherlands 10 per cent.

“Injection attacks are the biggest vulnerability in web applications and have been for the last few years,” according to Stuart Reed, Senior Director, Global Product Marketing at NTT Com Security. “If you look at many of the major security breaches that have hit the headlines recently, typically they are injection attacks because they are attractive targets containing sensitive information like credit card details and valuable customer data.

“The question is why after a decade, major breaches are still happening through known holes in web applications and why companies are still failing to put in place effective processes to patch legacy vulnerabilities? Organisations first of all need to ensure that they are building the right level of security into web applications to avoid this type of attack. And second, they need to have effective incident response plans in place to handle any potential or actual security breaches.”

Looking at attack types overall, the GTIR shows that web application attacks represented 10 per cent of all attack types last year in the UK, lower than in other markets, including the US (13 per cent) and Netherlands (17 per cent). The Nordics top the table in terms of web application attacks, with Sweden and Norway seeing a fifth (20 per cent) of all attacks come via web applications.

The GTIR was developed using NTT’s Global Threat Intelligence attack data from the NTT Group companies – including NTT Com Security, Solutionary, Dimension Data, NTT Data, NTT R&D and NTT Innovation Institute, Inc. The key findings in the 2015 Global Threat Intelligence Report are a result of the analysis of approximately six billion worldwide verified attacks over the course of 2014. The data for this report was collected from 16 Security Operations Centres (SOC) and 7 R&D centres, and supported by the thousands of NTT security specialists, professionals and researchers from around the world.

Additional GTIR report highlights (global statistics):

  • During 2014, 76% of identified vulnerabilities throughout all systems in the enterprise were more than 2 years old, and almost 9% of them were over 10 years old
  • 74% of organisations had no incident response plan in place in 2014
  • Incident response engagements involving malware threats increased 9% compared to 2013, from 43% to 52%
  • Just 46% of new malware is detected by anti-virus software
  • 52% of incidents were the result of malware
  • 17 of the top 20 vulnerabilities resided in user systems, not on servers
  • 56% of attacks against the NTT global client base originated from IP addresses within the US
  • Finance continues to represent the number one targeted sector with 18% of all detected attacks.

[su_box title=”About NTT Com Security” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″]

NTT Com SecurityNTT Com Security, we put information security and risk management in context enabling our customers to grasp new business opportunities without constraints. Our choice of consulting services, managed security services and technology solutions leaves our customers to focus on their business while we focus on managing risk.Organisations across all sectors trust our people to identify and evaluate the value of their information assets – and benefit from our collective industry know-how and technical excellence built over 20 years of working with leading Fortune 500 organisations.Our services portfolio covers every aspect of information security and risk management, from initial assessment through to strategic programme planning, hands-on deployment and round the clock management and support.[/su_box]

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Exploited Faster, Patched Slower: Verizon DBIR 2026 Shows Security Teams Losing Ground

May 20, 20265 Mins Read

Security’s Blind Spot: The Threats Hiding in “Low-Severity” Alerts

May 6, 20265 Mins Read

Why OSINT deserves the same status as other intelligence disciplines

March 17, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}