Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - News & Analysis - Less Than A Third Of UK Organisations Are Confident In Their Ability To Detect Threats
News & Analysis

Less Than A Third Of UK Organisations Are Confident In Their Ability To Detect Threats

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamNovember 24, 2014Updated:July 4, 20245 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
threat-detection
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Intel Security research reveals real-time response and integrated intelligence as critical to an organisation’s proactive threat prevention McAfee, now part of Intel Security, have issued a new report, When Minutes Count, that assesses organisations’ abilities to detect and deflect targeted attacks. It also revealed the top eight most critical indicators of attack, and examines best practices for proactive incident response.

A survey commissioned by Intel Security and conducted by Evalueserve, in conjunction with the report, suggests that a majority of companies lack confidence in their ability to detect targeted attacks in a timely manner. Even companies best prepared to handle targeted attacks are taking the time to investigate high volumes of events. Evidently there is a sense of urgency and organisational focus on creative approaches to earlier detection and more effective mitigation.

Key UK findings:

– Over two thirds (69%) of UK respondents indicated that targeted attacks are a primary concern for their organisations

– 69% of UK organisations investigated 10 or more attacks last year in comparison to the global figure of 58%

– Less than a third (27%) of UK respondents said they are confident in their ability to detect an attack within minutes, with the global figure being  just under a quarter (24%); just under half said it would take days, weeks, or even months before they noticed suspicious behaviour

– 71% of those able to detect attacks in minutes had a proactive, real-time Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system

– Half of the companies surveyed indicated that they have adequate tools and technologies to deliver faster incident response but often critical indicators are not isolated from the alerts generated

“You only have an advantage over your attackers when you address the time-to-discovery challenge,” said Raj Samani, VP, CTO for Intel Security, EMEA. “IT departments are inundated by alerts every day and the job to sift through threat data becomes a huge task. With real time intelligence and analytics, the overwhelming process of filtering this sea of alerts and indicators can be simplified and organisations can gain a deeper understanding supporting the context of relevant events. As a result, organisations can detect and deflect attacks much more quickly.”

Detecting attacks in the first few minutes is critical. When Minutes Count uncovers the top eight most common attack activities successful organisations track to detect and deflect targeted attacks. Having a contextual understanding of the indicators proved to be most important for organisations under threat:

1) Foreign bodies: Internal hosts communicating with known bad destinations or to a foreign country where organisations don’t conduct business.

2) Inside out: Internal hosts communicating to external hosts using non-standard ports or protocol/port mismatches.

3) Leapfrog: Publically accessible or demilitarised zone (DMZ) hosts communicating to internal hosts. This allows leapfrogging from the outside to the inside and back, permitting data exfiltration and remote access to assets. It neutralises the value of the DMZ.

4) Out of hours: Off-hour malware detection. Alerts that occur outside standard business operating hours could signal a compromised host.

5) Finding the intruder: Network scans by internal hosts communicating with multiple hosts in a short time frame, which could reveal an attacker moving laterally within the network. Perimeter network defences, such as firewall, are rarely configured to monitor traffic on the internal network (but could be).

6) Recognising patterns: Multiple alarm events from a single host or duplicate events across multiple machines in the same subnet over a 24-hour period, such as repeated authentication failures.

7) Cleaning up: After being cleaned, a system is re-infected with malware within five minutes — repeated reinfections signal the presence of a rootkit or persistent compromise.

8) User error: A user account trying to login to multiple resources within a few minutes from/to different regions—a sign that the user’s credentials have been stolen or that a user is up to mischief.

“We noticed a workstation making odd authentication requests to the domain controller at two o’clock in the morning. That could be normal activity, but it could also be a sign of something malicious,” said Lance Wright, senior manager of information security and compliance at Volusion, a commerce solutions provider contributing to the report. “After that incident we set up a rule to alert us if any workstation has more than five authentication requests during non-business hours to help us identify the attack early, before any data is compromised.”

“Real-time, intelligence-aware, SIEM technologies minimise time to detection to proactively prevent breaches based on contextualisation of indicators during analysis and automated policy-driven responses,” said Samani. “With the power to accelerate their ability to detect, respond to, and learn from events, organisations can dramatically shift their security posture from that of the hunted, to the hunter.”

To view the full Intel Security When Minutes Count report, please visit:  www.mcafee.com/SIEM

About Intel Security

McAfee is now part of Intel Security. With its Security Connected strategy, innovative approach to hardware-enhanced security, and unique Global Threat Intelligence, Intel Security is intensely focused on developing proactive, proven security solutions and services that protect systems, networks, and mobile devices for business and personal use around the world. Intel Security is combining the experience and expertise of McAfee with the innovation and proven performance of Intel to make security an essential ingredient in every architecture and on every computing platform. Intel Security’s mission is to give everyone the confidence to live and work safely and securely in the digital world. www.intelsecurity.com.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Exploited Faster, Patched Slower: Verizon DBIR 2026 Shows Security Teams Losing Ground

May 20, 20265 Mins Read

Security’s Blind Spot: The Threats Hiding in “Low-Severity” Alerts

May 6, 20265 Mins Read

Why OSINT deserves the same status as other intelligence disciplines

March 17, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}