Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Phishing - Microsoft Tops Phishing Charts in Early 2025
Phishing Attacks Latest News News & Analysis Security

Microsoft Tops Phishing Charts in Early 2025

Josh Breaker RolfeBy Josh Breaker RolfeMay 1, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Microsoft Tops Phishing Charts
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

In the first quarter, phishing scammers impersonated Microsoft more than any other single brand, with the IT giant accounting for 36% of all brand phishing attempts, according to a recent report from Check Point Research. This marks a continuation of scammers favoring Microsoft from previous quarters, as cybercriminals continue to exploit the company’s widespread usage and familiarity among users.  

Google and Apple Follow as Prime Targets 

 Fellow tech giants Google and Apple took second and third place, accounting for 12% and 8% of brand impersonation attempts, respectively. The report highlights the increasing trend of cybercriminals leveraging the credibility of major technology platforms to lure victims into disclosing sensitive information such as login credentials or financial data.  

Mastercard Makes a Comeback 

Mastercard has returned to the list for the first time since Q3 2023, securing the fifth position with 3% of phishing activity. Check Point explains Mastercard’s reappearance by pointing to a significant phishing campaign targeting Mastercard users in Japan. The campaign used fraudulent websites that closely resembled the official Mastercard page to collect personal and financial information, including credit card numbers and CVV codes.  

Fake sites included:  

  • mastercard-botan[.]aluui[.]cn 
  • mastercard-pitiern[.]gmkt6q[.]cn 
  • mastercard-orexicible[.]bvswu[.]cn 
  • mastercard-transish[.]gmkt7e[.]cn 

Check Point notes that, while these sites are no longer active, Mastercard’s resurgence reflects a broader focus on financial institutions as phishing targets.  

Top 10 Most Imitated Brands in Q1 2025 

According to Check Point’s research, the following brands were the most frequently impersonated in phishing attempts throughout the first quarter of 2025:  

  1. Microsoft – 36% 
  1. Google – 12% 
  1. Apple – 8% 
  1. Amazon – 4% 
  1. Mastercard – 3% 
  1. Alibaba – 2% 
  1. WhatsApp – 2% 
  1. Facebook – 2% 
  1. LinkedIn – 2 
  1. Adobe – 1% 

Technology Sector Remains a Prime Target 

Clearly, the tech sector is the most targeted industry, with phishing campaigns frequently masquerading as well-known software and platform providers. This trend aligns with the growing dependence on digital services in both personal and professional contexts. Social networks and retail brands were also heavily targeted, often through fake login portals or promotional scams.  

Phishing Methods Grow Increasingly Sophisticated 

The report also highlights an increase in the sophistication of phishing tactics. Fake websites are becoming increasingly convincing, often using lookalike domains and copied branding to deceive users. Moreover, while attackers continue to rely on email as the primary vector for these campaigns, they are also leveraging SMS (smishing) and messaging apps to increase their reach and credibility.  

Recommendations 

To combat brand impersonation, Check Point researchers recommend:  

  • Verifying the authenticity of email senders and links 
  • Avoiding the sharing of personal information through unsolicited messages 
  • Using multi-factor authentication wherever possible 
  • Keeping systems and software up to date 
Josh Breaker Rolfe

Josh is a Content writer at Bora. He graduated with a degree in Journalism in 2021 and has a background in cybersecurity PR. He's written on a wide range of topics, from AI to Zero Trust, and is particularly interested in the impacts of cybersecurity on the wider economy.

  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Thales Data Threat Report: AI and Cloud Complexity Fuel New Data Security Risks
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    50+ Organizations Breached Due to Missing MFA
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Red Hat OpenShift AI Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Seize Infrastructure Control

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

New Phishing Kit Starkiller Defeats Multi-Factor Authentication

February 23, 20264 Mins Read

ReliaQuest Uncovers Social Media Phishing Campaign Built on Trusted Tools

January 22, 20266 Mins Read

What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?

January 5, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}