Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - News & Analysis - Protecting Your Brand From E-Criminals
News & Analysis

Protecting Your Brand From E-Criminals

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamNovember 3, 2014Updated:April 30, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
online brand
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

In October 2014, Converse, the US shoe company, filed 31 lawsuits against companies which it claims are copying the design of its trademark shoe – the Chuck Taylor sneaker. Wal-Mart and Ralph Lauren are among the retailers which have had lawsuits filed against them. In order to protect its trademarks, Converse has reportedly issued around 180 cease and desist letters to retailers selling look-a-like Chuck Taylor sneakers in the past six years.

An uphill battle against counterfeiters…

Converse’s lawsuits highlight the uphill battle that fashion brands face in protecting their trademarks. Legal mechanisms are essential to protect companies’ rights and revenues, and Converse clearly has trademarks in place to safeguard its iconic designs. It should not hesitate to leverage these rights where it believes it is necessary.

Featured Download: Social media access at work. Do your employees know the rules?

However, it is not just look-a-like goods being sold by legitimate retailers which are a problem. The internet is a vast, unregulated space where counterfeiters and e-criminals are able to promote and sell imitation goods on an immense global scale. In 2013 alone, NetNames removed two billion items from online auction sites and shut down thousands of rogue websites on behalf of its customers, all of which we focused on selling counterfeit goods.

It isn’t just about protecting revenue…

According to Home Office figures, £1.3 billion worth of counterfeit goods are sold in the UK each year. This represents a significant amount of revenue being lost by brand owners, whose customers are often unknowingly purchasing inferior, and in some cases dangerous, imitations of the real thing. Counterfeit goods undoubtedly have a negative impact on a brand’s revenue. However, the risks extend beyond just financial impacts. Reputational damage also has a significant impact on a brand’s value, and recent NetNames research revealed that 78 percent of consumers said they would shun a brand if they ended up on a bogus website pretending to be that brand. Brands need to develop an effective online strategy that dovetails with their business objectives whilst protecting both their intellectual property and online customers.

Fashion brands must be alert to the threats posed by imitations and counterfeit goods, in addition to the challenges presented by the internet as a distribution network for these products. Businesses can and should identify the greatest threats to their brand and seek to take action, particularly where there are well defined processes on the internet. Only then will brands be able to protect their customers, brand value, and revenues from the online criminals.

By Haydn Simpson, Brand Protection Director, NetNames

About NetNames

NetNamesWith online channels becoming increasingly important for a corporate’s commercial and marketing activities, NetNames offers a single point of contact for management of internet domain names, in all locations, globally, and protection for brands across all online environments. NetNames offers expertise, infrastructure and service levels which are hard for corporates to replicate internally and enjoys long term relationships with large and mid-sized corporates.

Headquartered in London, NetNames’ global network includes offices in Cambridge, Paris, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Zurich, Munich, New York, San Francisco, Melbourne and Singapore.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

December 18, 20255 Mins Read

How to Protect Your VoIP System from DDoS Attacks

September 9, 20258 Mins Read

What Happens When Devices Cross Borders? The Role of Geofencing in Global IT

August 7, 20256 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}