Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Ransomware - Ransomware Payments Fall 35%
Ransomware Attacks News & Analysis Study & Research

Ransomware Payments Fall 35%

Josh Breaker RolfeBy Josh Breaker RolfeFebruary 12, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Ransomware
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Ransomware payments decreased by 35.82% year-over-year (YoY) in 2024, research from Chainalysis has revealed. The blockchain analytics company attributes much of this decrease to increased law enforcement actions, improved international collaboration, and a growing refusal of victims to pay.  

While, throughout 2024, less than half of recorded incidents resulted in victims paying ransoms, and several major ransomware groups experienced disruption, Chainalysis is quick to mention that attackers are adapting to their new reality, rebranding and deploying new ransomware strains.  

Changing Victim Behaviors

Changing victim behaviors are largely responsible for the fall in ransomware payments, with victims choosing backup recovery and alternative solutions over complying with ransom demands. In 2024, just 30% of ransomware negotiations resulted in payments, while the gap between demands and payments widened to 53%.  

Jon Miller, CEO and Co-founder of Halcyon believes that victim organizations are better prepared for ransomware attacks, actively seeking experienced consultants and incident responders to minimize attack disruption and subsequent ransom payments.  

The Shifting Ransomware Threat Landscape

However, Miller also believes that a changing threat landscape is also responsible for falling ransomware payments. He argues that 2024 saw an influx of new ransomware groups, who tend to make smaller ransom demands than their larger, more established peers.  

“The latest reporting indicates there were more attacks in 2024, but the total sum of ransom payments was less than the record set for 2023. This could be chalked up to more groups with less experienced operators, or by choice, they decided that multiple smaller ransom payments were a better option than fewer large ransoms that would draw the attention of LEO – they are trying to fly below the radar,” he said.  

The Chainalysis report supports Miller’s claims, highlighting that several major ransomware groups either experienced disruption or disappeared completely in 2024. For example, after LockBit and ALPHV/BlackCat fell off the map, newer groups like RansomHub (which absorbed displaced operators from LockBit and BlackCat) and Fog emerged to fill the power vacuum they left behind.  

Looking Ahead

While it’s encouraging that ransomware payments are falling, the cybersecurity industry must not become complacent. If we want to see ransomware payments continue falling, law enforcement action needs to ramp up further, and victim organizations need to up their resilience. For Chanalysis, collaboration between cybersecurity firms, law enforcement, and blockchain experts is essential to further reduce ransomware threats. 

Josh Breaker Rolfe

Josh is a Content writer at Bora. He graduated with a degree in Journalism in 2021 and has a background in cybersecurity PR. He's written on a wide range of topics, from AI to Zero Trust, and is particularly interested in the impacts of cybersecurity on the wider economy.

  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Thales Data Threat Report: AI and Cloud Complexity Fuel New Data Security Risks
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    50+ Organizations Breached Due to Missing MFA
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Red Hat OpenShift AI Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Seize Infrastructure Control

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Foxconn confirms cyberattack following Nitrogen ransomware claims

May 14, 20263 Mins Read

Lazarus Group Turns to Medusa Ransomware in Escalating Global Extortion Campaign

February 26, 20263 Mins Read

The Cyberattack That Exposed the Fragility of Digital Heritage

February 11, 20268 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}