Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Software Vulnerabilities Kill Vendors’ Productivity, Too
Articles

Software Vulnerabilities Kill Vendors’ Productivity, Too

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamApril 24, 20174 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
BlackLotus: UEFI Bootkit Bypass Secure Boot On Windows 11
BlackLotus: UEFI Bootkit Bypass Secure Boot On Windows 11
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Last December we found out about a new vulnerability in Netgear routers. This is yet another occurrence in a long list of mishaps that can allow attackers to take over networking and security equipment and as a result gain a foothold in our networks and compromise business or personal information.

Vulnerabilities have always been part of the technology industry’s landscape. A vulnerability is a bug, and no one has found a way to create software without bugs. Vendors can tighten up their secure software development cycles to minimize occurrences, and customers need to stay current with software releases of the products they use, despite being short staffed and having more pressing threats and risks to tend to.

So, if vendors will always have bugs and customers are too busy, are we doomed to be exposed to these vulnerabilities forever? The short answer is no – but we will get to that later.

What we are experiencing is an architectural problem that must be solved before the situation can get any better. In the Netgear example we have millions of pieces of equipment across a dozen models that are vulnerable. Each one is its own universe. Hardware, firmware and operating system that were created at the time the device shipped. There is a need to deal with each combination – design, develop and test a patch – and then have customers apply it to the various instances in their environment.

I experienced the pain associated with this process, from the vendor side, first hand. Seven years ago, I worked for a network security appliance vendor that encountered its very first vulnerability. White Hat hackers did pen testing at one of our customers and found a way to bypass security processing. Unfortunately, it was a design bug. It required the R&D organization to develop a fix for every single version of software we had out there. That was a huge effort that impacted development plans for the quarter.

There was a bitter twist to this story – end of life software versions. The need to develop and test updates for appliance software builds no longer in production for many years was a mega project all by itself. Under normal conditions, customers would be required to upgrade their software and potentially their devices – but with a security fix, can you force the customer’s hand? Customers often resist any attempt to “touch” such environments in a way that can cause stability issues. They would prefer to continue to be exposed rather than take the risk.

Ultimately, it was a negative experience for both the vendor and the customers. While customers value the effort to keep products secure and up to date, they all needed to take the time and effort to plan and apply the patch. Others were forced to upgrade and a few declined despite our best communications efforts. As a vendor, we would prefer to see no customers left behind – no matter what risks they were willing to take on.

There was another lesson here. These “dated software” customers also couldn’t benefit from new features. Initially, they avoided patching for stability, but later they couldn’t upgrade because new software builds were starting to rely on stronger underlying hardware. So patch avoidance was also making the rollout of new capabilities, impossible. If a customer don’t patch, they become not only a “headline risk” but also likely to drop you as a vendor as they may have the wrong perception of your capabilities and value.

There is of course a way out. Cloud-based delivery of enterprise security software. A cloud vendor is responsible for maintaining a single code base that serves all customers. It can be upgraded at will as long as the system is backward compatible. The benefits of this model cannot be overstated. Any vulnerability in the system can be centrally closed and new features can be rapidly rolled out and activated either automatically or by the customers. From a vendor standpoint, this accelerates feedback loop into development on the value, impact and usage of new features, which in turn can be quickly converted to new enhancements and features that benefit customers. The future of software is “cloud delivered” – enabling both vendors and customers to achieve better stronger security at a lower cost and leaving  the “vulnerability aftermath nightmare” behind.

[su_box title=”About Yishay Yovel” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″][short_info id=’60593′ desc=”true” all=”false”][/su_box]

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Roundcube RCE Vulnerability Disclosed Early Amid Active Exploitation

June 10, 20255 Mins Read

Fake Indian Government Portal Used to Spread Cross-Platform Malware in Suspected APT36 Campaign

May 13, 20253 Mins Read

New Federal Alert Warns U.S. Businesses of Medusa Ransomware Surge

March 13, 20254 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}