69% of security professionals believe countries with government mandated encryption backdoors suffer an economic disadvantage in the global marketplace
Venafi®, the leading provider of machine identity protection, today announced the results of a survey on government-mandated encryption backdoors that evaluated the opinions of 517 IT security professionals attending the RSA Conference 2019. It showed that 73 percent of respondents believe countries with government-mandated encryption backdoors are more susceptible to nation-state attacks.
“This is a tense moment for industry professionals because they know backdoors make our critical infrastructure more vulnerable,” said Kevin Bocek, vice president of security strategy and threat intelligence at Venafi. “This is not rocket science; backdoors inevitably create vulnerabilities that can be exploited by malicious actors. It’s understandable that so many security professionals are concerned because backdoors are especially appealing to hostile and abusive government agencies and more governments are considering these mandates.”
Additional findings from the survey include:
- Sixty-nine percent believe countries with government-mandated encryption backdoors suffer economic disadvantages in the global marketplace as a result.
- Seventy percent believe governments should not be able to force technology companies to grant access to encrypted user data.
- Twenty-five percent believe technology companies are doing enough to protect consumers’ personal information.
Bocek added: “Last December, Australia’s parliament passed legislation requiring tech businesses to create encryption backdoors within their products. We know thatattackers don’t abide by restrictions; they don’t follow the rules or buy products in controlled markets. Countries that enact these near-sighted restrictions harm law abiding businesses and court economic damage as well as intrusions focused on sovereign government processes.”
The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.