Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Zero Day - Google Mandiant: Time-to-Exploit Falls, Zero Day Exploits Rise
Zero Day Latest News News & Analysis Study & Research Threats and Vulnerabilities

Google Mandiant: Time-to-Exploit Falls, Zero Day Exploits Rise

Josh Breaker RolfeBy Josh Breaker RolfeOctober 23, 2024Updated:November 8, 20243 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Zero day
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

A staggering 70% of exploited vulnerabilities in 2023 were leveraged as zero days, meaning threat actors exploited the flaws in attacks before the impacted vendors knew of the bug’s existence or had been able to patch them. In addition, the average Time-to-Exploit (TTE) fell from 32 to just five days.

These were two of the findings of new research that also revealed a shift in ratios between n-day (vulnerabilities first exploited after patches are available) and zero-day vulnerabilities in the past few years. Throughout 2021 and 2022, analysts observed a 38/62 split between n-day and zero-day vulnerabilities. By 2023, the ratio had changed to 30:70.

Another significant revelation is that TTE has fallen significantly. According to the report, the average TTE throughout 2018 and 2019 was 63 days, falling to 44 by early 2021, 32 in 2022, and, finally, just five days in 2023.

What the Experts Say

Security experts have expressed concern over these statistics, urging organizations to implement measures to help security teams act swiftly to prevent cyberattacks.

Patrick Tiquet, Vice President of Security & Architecture at Keeper Security, emphasizes the growing threat posed by zero-day vulnerabilities. “What once took a month to patch now requires action within just five days,” he notes, highlighting the need for robust, proactive security measures and well-prepared incident response plans.

Von Tran, Senior Manager of Security Operations at Bugcrowd, stresses the importance of a dedicated zero-day response team for effective collaboration. “It’s crucial for companies to have a dedicated team and escalation hotlines to prioritize fixes within this five-day window,” said Tran. He also recommends investing in solutions like External Attack Surface Management (EASM) to assess risks better.

Sarah Jones, Cyber Threat Intelligence Research Analyst at Critical Start, points to the need for rapid patch management and proactive threat hunting considering compressed TTEs. “Organizations must focus on seamless coordination and leveraging advanced tools to mitigate potential attacks,” she advised.

Enhanced Detection and Response Needed

As the number of identified vulnerabilities continues to rise, threat actors gain more opportunities to exploit these weaknesses. Mandiant says its findings indicate that exploits, both zero-days and n-days, have been the leading initial infection vector in Mandiant Incident Response (IR) engagements from 2020 to 2023.

This trend means that defenders must enhance their detection and response capabilities while adapting to incidents in real-time. Additionally, prioritizing patches has become increasingly challenging, as n-days are being exploited more rapidly and across a wider range of products.

The proliferation of available technologies broadens attack surfaces, highlighting the need to consider how a single vulnerable technology can impact systems and networks laterally. To mitigate the extent of affected systems and data during exploitation, it is essential to prioritize segmented architectures and access control measures.

Josh Breaker Rolfe

Josh is a Content writer at Bora. He graduated with a degree in Journalism in 2021 and has a background in cybersecurity PR. He's written on a wide range of topics, from AI to Zero Trust, and is particularly interested in the impacts of cybersecurity on the wider economy.

  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Thales Data Threat Report: AI and Cloud Complexity Fuel New Data Security Risks
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    50+ Organizations Breached Due to Missing MFA
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Red Hat OpenShift AI Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Seize Infrastructure Control

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Microsoft discloses Exchange zero-day with no patch yet available

May 18, 20263 Mins Read

WhatsApp Reveals Zero-Day Exploited in Targeted Apple Attacks

September 3, 20253 Mins Read

Windows Shortcut Zero-Day Under Active Attack

March 21, 20254 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}