Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Critical Infrastructure Security - UK CNI’s Overconfidence Puts National Security at Risk
Critical Infrastructure Security News & Analysis Security Study & Research

UK CNI’s Overconfidence Puts National Security at Risk

Josh Breaker RolfeBy Josh Breaker RolfeMarch 24, 20254 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
CNI
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Despite mounting threats and high incident rates, organizations in the UK’s critical national infrastructure (CNI) sector display an alarming overconfidence in their cybersecurity defenses. According to Bridewell’s latest Cyber Security in Critical National Infrastructure Organizations report, confidence that critical systems are protected from cyber threats has grown steadily since 2025, despite 95% of respondents admitting they suffered a breach within the past year.  

Organizations Overestimate Cyber Defenses 

This overconfidence is most obvious when it comes to risk assessments: 90% of respondents were confident that their organization’s current cyber risk assessment approach reflected their cyber risk posture, but only 25% are conducting valid assessments by identifying threat vectors and assessing controls against each of them, which Bridewell argues is the only effective approach to risk assessment.  

According to Martin Riley, Chief Technology Officer at Bridewell, this discrepancy is particularly notable in the OT security space. He argues that “confidence in OT security is high, but our research suggests this confidence may be misplaced. Many organizations are only just beginning to assess risks in their industrial control systems.” 

Cloud security is another area riddled with misplaced confidence. While 84% of respondents claim strong cloud protections, 40% also cited cloud services as a major attack vector, highlighting a dangerous gap between perception and reality.  

AI: A Double-Edged Sword 

The Bridewell also underscores how pressing the AI arms race is becoming. Concern about AI’s potential to cause harm has grown since 2024, with AI-powered phishing attacks causing the most concern (83%). Riley noted that attackers “don’t just use AI to remedy grammar and spelling mistakes; they also use it to gather information for highly targeted spear phishing scams, which is increasing click-through rates.”  

However, despite these concerns, cybercriminals are leveraging offensive AI much faster and to much greater effect than organizations are leveraging defensive AI. Although cybersecurity chatbots are the most popular AI-driven cybersecurity tool, with 32% of respondents reporting using them, no single technology has widespread adoption. In fact, some 5% of organizations use no AI tools at all.  

Regulation Alone Won’t Save CNI  

According to the report, CNI organizations view compliance as being more about reducing the risk of data breaches and cyberattacks (28%) than protecting customer and stakeholder trust (25%), meeting contractual or business partner requirements (16%), or gaining a competitive advantage. However, Riley expressed concern that organizations believe that compliance equals security.  

“Relying on regulation alone isn’t enough,” he said. “The threat landscape evolves faster than compliance frameworks can keep up. Companies need to be proactive, not reactive.” 

Ransomware Response is Too Slow 

Ransomware remains one of the most pressing threats to CNI, yet response times remain dangerously slow. 69% of organizations take up to six hours to respond to attacks, a significant delay in an industry where minutes can mean millions in damages. 

Worse yet, one-third of breached CNI organizations have paid a ransom – a risky practice that may soon be outlawed in the UK. However, although he doesn’t suggest paying ransoms, Anthony Young, Bridewell’s CEO, does recommend that CNI organizations negotiate.  

“Negotiating buys organizations time. It allows them to carry out incident activity while keeping attackers busy, which the ‘we don’t negotiate with terrorists approach’ doesn’t do. We actually recommend negotiation in the event of a ransomware attack.” 

The Urgent Need for Realism 

These findings highlight an uncomfortable truth: UK CNI organizations are dangerously overconfident about their cybersecurity posture. “If we don’t act now, we’ll be playing catch-up when it’s already too late,” Young concluded.  The lesson is clear – confidence does not equal security. Only by adopting a proactive, AI-driven and risk-aware cybersecurity strategy can UK infrastructure truly safeguard itself from the next wave of cyber threats 

Josh Breaker Rolfe

Josh is a Content writer at Bora. He graduated with a degree in Journalism in 2021 and has a background in cybersecurity PR. He's written on a wide range of topics, from AI to Zero Trust, and is particularly interested in the impacts of cybersecurity on the wider economy.

  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Thales Data Threat Report: AI and Cloud Complexity Fuel New Data Security Risks
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    50+ Organizations Breached Due to Missing MFA
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Red Hat OpenShift AI Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Seize Infrastructure Control

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The evolution of cyber risk: Addressing geopolitical threats

May 13, 20265 Mins Read

“Recovery Is the New Prevention”: a Q&A with CSO of Health-ISAC, Errol Weiss

May 7, 20266 Mins Read

Pro-Russian threat actors target Swedish heat and power plant in failed cyberattack

April 20, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}