Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Threats and Vulnerabilities - JFrog Uncovers Critical Vulnerabilities in Machine Learning Platforms
Threats and Vulnerabilities Latest News News & Analysis Study & Research

JFrog Uncovers Critical Vulnerabilities in Machine Learning Platforms

Josh Breaker RolfeBy Josh Breaker RolfeNovember 7, 20242 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Vulnerabilities in Machine Learning
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Software supply chain company JFrog revealed on Monday that it had discovered 22 software vulnerabilities across 15 machine learning-related open-source software projects. The results, presented in JFrog’s latest ML Bug Bonanza blog, shed light on the security challenges organizations face as they accelerate AI and ML adoption and highlight the need for more robust protections.

The blog post showcases the ten most severe server-side vulnerabilities and the techniques attackers are using to exploit them. According to the blog, those vulnerabilities would allow attackers to:

  • Hijack ML models remotely
  • Elevate ZenML Cloud privileges without authorization
  • Infect Model ML clients
  • Hijack ML database frameworks remotely
  • Conduct prompt injection code execution on the Vanna.AI platform
  • Exfiltrate and manipulate databases
  • Hijack ML pipelines remotely

“These vulnerabilities allow attackers to hijack important servers in the organization such as ML model registries, ML databases and ML pipelines,” JFrog researchers said. “Exploitation of some of these vulnerabilities can have a big impact on the organization — especially given the inherent post-exploitation vectors present in ML such as backdooring models to be consumed by multiple clients.”

According to JFrog, the disconnect between ML development and traditional application security (AppSec) practices has contributed to these vulnerabilities. When ML developers fail to consider established AppSec practices, organizations lack the oversight necessary to eradicate vulnerabilities before ML models go live.

Another of JFrog’s recent studies supports this claim, suggesting that although organizations are aware of the security issues associated with AI models, they lack the ability to fix them. 57% of organizations say that the lack of integration between AI/ML security and existing security programs leaves potential blind spots. As such, only 39% feel confident in their ability to secure AI/ML models.

Organizations are particularly concerned about data exposure from large language models (58%), malicious code embedded within AI models (49%), and AI bias affecting decision-making processes (41%) due to inadequate ML security.

These findings highlight the need to align ML development with traditional AppSec practices. While AI and ML can offer enormous benefits for organizations, it’s crucial not to prioritize rapid development over security. Doing so could compromise ML models and put organizations at risk.

Josh Breaker Rolfe

Josh is a Content writer at Bora. He graduated with a degree in Journalism in 2021 and has a background in cybersecurity PR. He's written on a wide range of topics, from AI to Zero Trust, and is particularly interested in the impacts of cybersecurity on the wider economy.

  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Thales Data Threat Report: AI and Cloud Complexity Fuel New Data Security Risks
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    50+ Organizations Breached Due to Missing MFA
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Red Hat OpenShift AI Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Seize Infrastructure Control

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Palo Alto warns of active exploitation of GlobalProtect authentication bypass flaw

June 2, 20263 Mins Read

How EM is boosting the career trajectory of VM analysts

May 19, 20266 Mins Read

Microsoft patches 138 vulnerabilities as AI-driven discovery accelerates

May 14, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}