Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - In The Wake Of The Interview: How The US Responded To The Sony Hack
Articles

In The Wake Of The Interview: How The US Responded To The Sony Hack

Ryan FarmerBy Ryan FarmerFebruary 18, 2015Updated:July 3, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Over two months after the attack by hackers on Sony Pictures, the cyber security landscape is still very much in the public eye. With notable hacks reported every week, firms big and small as well as governments are having to respond. Many of them are taking their lead from the US response to the Sony hack.

The Western Front

The Sony hack took place on 22nd November, when the firm’s computer systems were hacked. The perpetrators stole sensitive data, including embarrassing emails about staff and stars.

A media storm was kicked up as personal conversations about Hollywood actors were revealed, while rumours arose about North Korea being involved. This was denied by the communist country on 7th December, despite it heralding the attack as a ‘righteous deed’.

On 16th December, a hacker group calling itself ‘Guardians of Peace’ threatened a ‘9/11-style’ attack on cinemas that showed satirical movie The Interview, and the New York premiere was subsequently cancelled.

The days that followed saw cinemas all across the US pull their scheduled Boxing Day screenings of the film. Sony went on to cancel the film’s release completely.

The US government response

With media attention growing, the FBI released its report into the Sony hack on 19th December, concluding that North Korea had orchestrated the hack. On the same day, US President Barack Obama said Sony had made a mistake in cancelling the release of the film.

Responding to the FBI claims, North Korea proposed a joint inquiry into the hack with the US, but the latter rejected the request. Two days later on 22nd December, a huge outage of North Korea’s internet occurred, but the US government has never confirmed or denied its involvement.

On 23rd December, Sony announced that The Interview would get a limited release and a dual launch in cinemas and online resulted. The days following revealed big attendances in cinemas, in addition to record-breaking downloads online.

At the start of the new year on 2nd January, the US announced a raft of new sanctions on North Korea. They were targeting the defence industry of the country, which was already under sanction from the US.

Organisations included in the sanctions were the Reconnaissance General Bureau, the country’s foremost intelligence organisation, and the Korea Mining Development Trading Corporation (Komid). Four named officials from Komid were also sanctioned.

Wider reactions

The response from the US government to the hack on Sony has been criticised by some and applauded by others. However, the true response is far greater than sanctions and a possible internet outage.

One of the key retorts came out of a meeting between Obama and UK Prime Minister David Cameron.

On a flying visit to Washington DC, the two leaders discussed a round of cyber war games. Aimed at testing processes, procedures and those working in IT security and penetration testing jobs, the first exercise will test the financial industry.

The attack also highlighted the vulnerability of systems that are not adequately protected. As attacks continue right now, the importance for individuals to educate themselves on cyber security, and for firms to ensure their IT security recruitment drives are up to scratch, could not be clearer.

[su_box title=”About Ryan Farmer” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″]

Ryan Farmer has worked at Acumin for the past five and a half years as a Senior Consultant and now a Senior Resourcer. With a strong understanding of the InfoSecurity industry and the latest market developments, Ryan sources leading information security candidates for some of the world’s largest End User security teams, start up security vendors and global consultancies.Ryan is heavily involved in the Risk and Network Threat forum, has a keen interest in Mobile Security and is an active blogger and InfoSec writer.[/su_box]

 

Ryan Farmer

Information security, data protection, and compliance professional.

Blogger, writer, speaker.

  • Ryan Farmer
    What Can We Learn from the Year of the Breach?
  • Ryan Farmer
    Four Ways to Promote Safer Cyber Security Practices Among Staff
  • Ryan Farmer
    The Internet of Things and the Implications for Cyber Security
  • Ryan Farmer
    Cyber Security Issues and the Computer Games Industry

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Thousands of UK Government Devices Lost or Stolen, Raising Cybersecurity Fears

June 24, 20254 Mins Read

Roundcube RCE Vulnerability Disclosed Early Amid Active Exploitation

June 10, 20255 Mins Read

Fake Indian Government Portal Used to Spread Cross-Platform Malware in Suspected APT36 Campaign

May 13, 20253 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}