Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Why Is GDPR Still Not Being Treated Seriously Two Years On?
Articles

Why Is GDPR Still Not Being Treated Seriously Two Years On?

Aman JohalBy Aman JohalJune 1, 2020Updated:March 15, 20234 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

It’s sad, but unsurprising, that digital privacy regulations introduced in Europe over two years ago are in danger of failing because regulators are under-resourced.

As we mark the second anniversary of the introduction of the GDPR, a report by Brave – makers of a pro-privacy browser –found that “European governments have failed to equip their national regulators to enforce GDPR”. The report found that only five of Europe’s 28 national enforcers of the GDPR have more than 10 tech specialists each, and that half of EU enforcers of the GDPR have a small annual budget of €5 million or less.

Why was GDPR introduced? 

To understand the seriousness of these findings, let us cast our minds back to when the GDPR was introduced. On May 25th 2018, years of preparation resulted in the long-planned data protection reforms that came into force across Europe. The GDPR modernised the laws that protect the personal information of individuals and updated previous data protection rules that were two decades old – with some of them being first drafted in the 1980s, such as the UK’s Data Protection Act (DPA). 

According to the EU, the GDPR was designed to harmonise data privacy laws across its member states, give greater rights to individuals, and allow for large fines to be handed out to organisations in breach of the rules. 

What has happened since 2018?

Over two years on, it seems that many of the countries that signed up to the GDPR still have their heads in the sand when it comes to enforcement. For instance, the UK Government’s privacy watchdog is Europe’s largest and most expensive to run, yet only 3% of its 680 staff is focused on tech privacy problems. We can only assume that the root of this is under-resourcing.

The lack of funding and staff dedicated to tech privacy problems may help to explain why there have been few fines handed out to businesses that have experienced data breaches in recent years. The biggest penalties in the UK so far have only been issued as intentions to fine, which are for British Airways (£183m) and Marriott (£99m), and both are under appeal. British Airways is also facing a potential compensation pay-out which could amount to as much as £3 billion. 

These substantial but incomplete fines have failed to act as a deterrent. This year alone, we’ve seen Travelex and Loqbox experience high-profile data breaches. More recently, Virgin Media left the personal details of 900,000 individuals accessible online for 10 months. This included full names, email addresses, dates of birth, contact numbers, and details that linked some customers to explicit websites. Like British Airways, Virgin Media could be facing a substantial compensation bill estimated to be up to £4.5bn. 

And now, in the month of the second anniversary of the GDPR, airline EasyJet announces a monumental data breach affecting 9 million of its customers. It is clear that lessons are not being learned and there is a distinct lack of deterrent for organisations to act in accordance with the law. Perhaps when a significant regulatory fine is issued, or where a multi-billion pound compensation settles, we may finally see real changes. Until then, we anticipate more breaches taking place.

What are the consequences of the lack of funding for tech privacy? 

It will be interesting to see how the fines progress for each of the above data breaches. The lack of funding and attention outlined in the Brave report could mean that it takes years for these fines to be handed out. 

This, in turn, could diminish the GDPR’s authority over the approach of businesses to cybersecurity. A continued lack of funding for data protection watchdogs and a lack of swift execution of fines could mean that businesses fail to take the required steps to properly protect data – resulting in the personal information of more consumers being exposed. 

Going forward, it is vital that more staff and funding is dedicated to the enforcement of the GDPR. It’s no good having rules and laws in place if regulators lack the resources to enforce them. We are currently at a crossroads where European governments have the opportunity to boost their cybersecurity capabilities and enforce the rules they signed up to two years ago. If we continue down the road we are currently on, it’s likely we will see more organisations fail to protect personal information and more consumer data could be exposed to hackers. 

Aman Johal

Lawyer and Director

  • Aman Johal
    Learning Lessons From Previous Lockdowns – How Not To Fall Into The Trap Of A Cyberattack
  • Aman Johal
    The Importance Of Educating Staff On Cybersecurity
  • Aman Johal
    The Charing Cross Gender Identity Clinic Email Leak

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Visual data is the blind spot in enterprise security: that’s about to change

May 4, 20267 Mins Read

Making stolen data worthless: why security must start with the data

March 30, 20265 Mins Read

Meta’s Smart Glasses Privacy Scandal Expands After Sama Credentials Found on the Dark Web

March 10, 20264 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}