Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Deploying Apps At Speed? Try Self-Service Security
Articles

Deploying Apps At Speed? Try Self-Service Security

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamJuly 21, 2020Updated:March 4, 20235 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

The UK government isn’t the only organisation encountering issues between data security and app development. The pandemic is also putting pressure on businesses to develop and release apps at an increasingly rapid pace in order to meet demands for continuity. As a recent global report shows, business app sessions have increased by 105% in Q1 2020 compared to the same time last year. This surge, combined with the acceleration of digital transformation initiatives, means security’s priority status is under threat; right now, development teams’ focus is on releasing the next new set of features. So, with DevOps now front and centre of innovation across the business world, how should security teams engage with developers?

DevOps and Security go Hand-in-Hand

Many security teams are responding by making efforts to establish more effective partnerships with their DevOps counterparts. Some, for example, have focused on providing security solutions that make it easier for app developers to render security inherent to their apps. In many cases, this means providing developers with easily digestible security capabilities that can be easily incorporated into their automated processes.

However, some of these features are easier to incorporate than others. For example, code scanning tools can be added relatively easily to app development processes, preventing code with known viruses, bugs, or other issues from being incorporated into the framework.

Some security testing can also be automated, so that development frameworks automatically reject coding that fails and security checks are embedded in wider development processes. Unless a problem is detected, this ensures checks have minimal impact on individual developers writing their code.

That being said, the area of secrets management is a little more challenging.

Accessing the ‘Digital Vault’

Secrets management, in basic terms, refers to the management of authentication credentials. This category includes passwords and tokens that allow users to access applications, services, and other sensitive parts of an IT ecosystem.

Secrets management is potentially disruptive as it can impact each developer when they program and update apps to access sensitive resources. In this case, the developer needs to ensure each app securely accesses the resource using privileged credentials. So, when the app is in use, it needs to authenticate to the ‘digital vault’ – a secure location containing privileged credentials – and fetch the necessary information to access the resource. A newly written application, for example, will need to be coded in a way that allows it to obtain the credentials from the secrets management solution, which in turn must know to authenticate the application.

One emerging approach we’ve seen security teams adopt is to provide developers with a self-service solution. These allow developers to provide the apps they’re writing with secure access to databases and other resources more easily.

Your Secret’s Safe with Self-Service

At first, it might appear simpler for security teams to work directly with the developers and update secrets management solutions themselves. Afterall, this would allow them to ensure each new app can use the secrets management solution successfully. While this can work in a small team, an enterprise will have too many apps and likely many more programmers developing apps than a security team can handle manually. In that case, self-service becomes a necessity.

As an example, one of our enterprise customers operating in the retail space needed to rapidly and cost-effectively deploy new customer applications to compete with online retailers. The security team wanted to ensure applications securely accessed databases. This meant deploying a secrets management solution that could secure the core application functions used by the business (such as inventory, procurement, stores, and in-store pickup).

The business’ developers were great at writing apps. However, with over a thousand developers and only a small security team, security was concerned that they would be overwhelmed and become a roadblock, negatively impacting the deployment of apps. So, the retailer implemented a self-service solution.

The solution could automatically update the secrets manager’s policies. Then, with the updated policies in place, the secrets manager only allowed approved apps to securely access databases. Once it was set up, the solution could handle developers’ requests for app approval to access databases securely, only involving the security team where needed.

In another example, the security team at a financial services customer with a large number of applications wanted these applications to request secrets based on strict policy. However, security didn’t want to force the development teams to write security policies. So, to streamline the process, the company chose a self-service solution to automate the approval process. Now, when the developer’s request is approved, the security policy is automatically updated.

Easing the Burden of Digital Transformation

App development must be a highly efficient process; developers don’t want to work with solutions that take up unnecessary time. This means that a secrets management solution simply won’t be adopted if developers are dependent on security to update the access policies, or equally, if they’re forced to write the policies themselves.

When done incorrectly, organisations can experience significant developer pushback, poor levels of adoption, and either delays in app deployment, or apps that don’t access resources securely. The self-service approach avoids all of this by facilitating developer productivity rather than inhibiting it, becoming a win-win for both developers and security.

Self-service secrets management not only helps security teams build a partnership with developers, but also enables organisations to ensure the security of their applications.

Given these benefits, as enterprises with large portfolios make their digital transformation journey, they will likely turn more towards self-service approaches. Developers are therefore provided with an automated way to supply applications with secure access to sensitive resources. Similarly, at times when normal business practices shift dramatically to fit a new working environment, app development teams can deploy apps at speed without worrying about security issues.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

December 18, 20255 Mins Read

What Happens When Devices Cross Borders? The Role of Geofencing in Global IT

August 7, 20256 Mins Read

The Evolving Importance of Identity Governance in FinTech

July 10, 20258 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}