Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - News & Analysis - Chrome 40 and SHA-2: Certificate Boogaloo
News & Analysis

Chrome 40 and SHA-2: Certificate Boogaloo

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamJanuary 27, 2015Updated:July 4, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
chrome
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

The MD5 cryptographic hashing algorithm had taken a beating from security researchers in the early 2000s. It was getting cheaper and easier to generate MD5 collisions. That is, two different blobs of data could be generated that had the same output digest when run through the MD5 algorithm, sometimes with attacker-controlled input (a chosen-plaintext collision).

The implications of practical collision attacks against hashing algorithms such as MD5 are widespread. However, attacks up to 2008 had been primarily academic in nature: “Hey, look I can generate two giant files that have the same MD5 hash, if I lease out the supercomputer for a month.”

Free eBook: Modern Retail Security Risk – Get your copy now.

A group of security researchers decided to challenge the real-world security of the MD5 algorithm and targeted the Certificate Authorities (CAs) and PKI that form the underlying trust of SSL/TLS communications on the Internet. It turns out that several CAs were still using the MD5 algorithm for ensuring the integrity of their certificates.

So, this group of researchers pulled off a practical and severe MD5 collision attack against a CA’s certificate, allowing them to forge their own CA certificate and sign new valid certificates (eg. google.com) with it. And it didn’t take a ton of time and money, just a day or two using 200 Playstation 3s.

So, MD5 was ejected from use by CAs, and SHA-1 was the new algorithm of choice.

Ok, fast forward back to today.

The SHA-1 algorithm that we replaced MD5 with is facing similar pressure and attacks. We’ve also seen that it’s not just academic researchers we need to worry about, but large nation-state intelligence agencies that have more funding and resources than a few Playstation consoles and plenty of motivation and newly-documented ambition to break much of the cryptography used on the Internet to secure communications.

In fact, besides all the Snowden/NSA docs, the Flame malware discovered back in 2012 that is rumored to have been written (at least in part) by US intelligence agencies used an advanced private-developed variation of the MD5 collision attack in order to create a forged Windows Update certificate.

While SHA-1 is not in the same immediate peril as MD5 was back in 2008, we’ve learned to be a little more progressive in terms of Internet security, given a better understanding of where the intelligence community may be at in terms of capabilities compared to the attacks against SHA-1 that are publicly disclosed by academic researchers. So, to get a bit ahead of the curve, CAs have begun to issue SHA-2 based certificates and are slowly deprecating any SHA-1 certificates to avoid history repeating itself.

To accelerate the migration from SHA-1 to SHA-2, Google has decided to warn users about SHA-1 certificates in the Chrome web browser. In other words, if you visit a website that has not yet moved to a SHA-2 SSL certificate, Chrome will display a warning in the address bar where the “SSL lock” usually is. These changes to the Chrome web browser will likely hit hundreds of millions of Internet users this week with the release of Chrome 40, so get ready for warning-palooza!

To learn what this means for Duo customers and for normal users, please view the original article on Duo Security’s blog here.

By Jon Oberheide, Co-founder and CTO, Duo Security | @jonoberheide

Jon OberheideJon Oberheide is the co-founder and CTO of Duo Security, responsible for leading product vision and the Duo Labs advanced research team. Before starting Duo, Jon was a self-loathing academic, completing his PhD at the University of Michigan in the realm of cloud security. In a prior life, Jon enjoyed offensive security research and generally hacking the planet. Jon was recently named to Forbes “30 under 30″ list for his mobile security hijinks.

About Duo Security

Duo-SecurityDuo Security is on a mission to provide advanced security solutions for organizations of all sizes. Duo’s innovative technology protects users, data and applications from credential theft and breaches with a focus on streamlined usability. The company was co-founded by CEO Dug Song, a major contributor to the security community, and CTO Jon Oberheide, expert cloud, mobile, and malware security researcher.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Tenable warns AI adoption is outpacing governance as cloud exposure risks surge

May 15, 20264 Mins Read

Cloud Security Controls Explained: A Definitive Guide

March 19, 20269 Mins Read

From VPS to Phishing: Darktrace Exposes SaaS Hijacks through Virtual Infrastructure Abuse

August 22, 20255 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}