Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - 5 Prerequisites For Trusting Security Automation
Articles

5 Prerequisites For Trusting Security Automation

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamNovember 17, 20165 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Addressing the trust factor in security orchestration and automation

Any conversation about using automation in cybersecurity inevitably wanders into a discussion about trust. IT and security professionals simply have trouble “taking the leap” and trusting in software to manage tasks that have always relied upon personal experiences, years of training and in many cases, gut instinct, to take the proper actions. While some vendors choose to pit automation vendors against human cyber analysts in an all or nothing battle royal, the reality of how automation can complement human intelligence is a bit more nuanced and subtle.

But the question of whether automation can be trusted is a valid one, and when it comes to automating any aspect of information security, being skeptical is understandable. After all, a good IT or cybersecurity professional needs a little bit of skepticism and an ability to ask critical questions when vetting the technology that will secure their organization.

For those that realize the promise that automation holds in the cybersecurity fight, but want to ensure proper due diligence before implementing it, here are 5 prerequisites that must be satisfied before any enterprise can trust security automation.

Prerequisite #1: Security Automation Must Be Repeatable

Without predictability, there is no trust. In order to believe that an automation tool will perform as intended, there needs to be a demonstrated record of repeatability. Think of every meal you’ve ever eaten in a restaurant: a server is willing to take your order and bring you drinks and the chef is willing to cook your food all without demanding you pay up front in full. Why would they take that risk? Because thousands of transactions have proven that customers will pay. A similar thought process must be applied when choosing to implement security automation. It’s important to look for solutions that have been proven to repeatably achieve their intended tasks.

Prerequisite #2: Auditable

While some think of automation as a “black box” comprised of a mixture of magic and alchemy, true automation must be repeatable and visible to the user. Every action taken and every decision made must be auditable. Other technologies, such as online banking, have shown that this philosophy is key to earning the trust of customers. In the early days of online banking, people were justifiably confused by the idea that all transactions would happen automatically without a person being involved. But the fact that a searchable record exists showing every dollar going in and out of the account allowed for the trust needed to make the switch from paper and trips to see the teller. In other words, it’s important to trust, but verify.

Prerequisite #3: Reversible

Any time a system has access to a company’s data and the ability to take action, there must also be a process in place to reverse those actions. Without a way to reverse a course of action, automation will be too much of a risk for large scale adoption. In some respects, this goes hand-in-hand with having an audit trail – you need make sure that any technology being evaluated has the capability of walking back the steps it has taken. This ability will go a long way in making it easier to trust automation and provide the peace of mind needed take the initial leap of faith.

Prerequisite #4: Kill Switch / Interrupt

To fully trust automation, there must be a way to stop it. Even in the physical world, places where we use technology to automate tasks – from a factory assembly line, to the escalator in the mall – have some sort of kill switch. The cutting-edge world of driverless cars is another example – you’ll note that any driverless vehicle is equipped with an override that allows the driver to take control. When dealing with any automated technology, simply having the option for a human to step in and take control is a major trust factor. This is just as important in cybersecurity as it is in any other field.

Prerequisite #5: Learn/Adapt

Finally, an automation solution must be able to learn and adapt for enterprises to be willing to invest the time and resources to get up and running. Without the ability to get better with time and more data, you’re only able to automate what you know today. But tomorrow is coming, and you can bet it will bring with it new challenges. These challenges are impossible to predict today, so for technology to be providing return on investment years, or even weeks from now, it must be capable of learning and adapting.

If any cybersecurity automation technology you’re evaluating shows that it is repeatable, auditable, reversible, can be interrupted and can learn and adapt, these attributes should go a long way in earning your trust. Cybercriminals are automating the methods they use to increase the volume and complexity of attacks, so automating a defense will be key to maintaining a strong security posture. It’s time to take the leap and even the playing field.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

December 18, 20255 Mins Read

What Happens When Devices Cross Borders? The Role of Geofencing in Global IT

August 7, 20256 Mins Read

The Evolving Importance of Identity Governance in FinTech

July 10, 20258 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}