Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Bridging The Gap Between Speed And Security In DevOps
Articles

Bridging The Gap Between Speed And Security In DevOps

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamApril 1, 20194 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

A guide to keeping security at the heart of DevOps development cycles, by Josh Kirkwood, DevOps Security Lead, CyberArk

Remember the famous engineering project triangle? It calls on organisations to forgo one of the following traits in exchange for a product development cycle to have the other two attributes: speed, quality and value. This essential model has sat at the very centre of project management issues for years, supporting the rise of cost projections, delay of deadlines and most importantly, increased rigidity around quality assurance requirements. As competition has transformed technology in recent years, C-level executives have started to opt for speed at the core of their model to satisfy ever tighter deadlines and be the first to market. It of course makes sense why DevOps practises have become so prevalent in the past decade.

But in their readiness to adopt DevOps tools and methodologies in the hopes of seeing tremendous business benefits, security practices get pushed aside. Numbers don’t lie: in Deloitte’s latest study on the state of DevOps, 71% of businesses feel that their teams currently lack adequate working knowledge to incorporate security into their systems (an approach otherwise known as DevSecOps).

This gap in knowledge underlines the potential data security issues that businesses risk creating for themselves. This is especially true when considering that DevOps tends to outpace traditional security controls. The truth is that, while developers want security, when security threatens to slow down getting new applications to customers (whether internal or external), security suffers. It’s an issue CISOs across the globe face – how do you prioritize security without impacting developer velocity?  The below five tips sourced from an expert panel of CISOs show how some of the world’s most accomplished technologists are working to combat bad habits and securing the DevOps cycle. Here are some of their key ideas.

Transform the security team into DevOps partners

Many DevOps practitioners do take security seriously; in fact, in the Sonatype DevSecOps Community Survey 2018  91% agree that “security is part of everyone’s job.” So, for security, the challenge can be harnessing the developers’ beliefs and energy. For example, security teams can engage more effectively by getting up to speed on DevOps tools and techniques. They can also help developers to do the right thing by offering reusable code modules, and self-service approaches that make it easier for developers to adopt good security practices.

Prioritise securing DevOps tools and infrastructure

Some important places to get started are reducing the concentration of privilege in the build automation tools and ensuring that code repositories do not expose secrets. Currently, GitHub boasts a userbase of 28 million developers. Its largely searchable code repositories are a noted security risk amongst teams. For example, Uber’s recent data breach served as an all too painful reminder of this aspect of its platform. When hackers broke into the company’s source code repository on GitHub, they were able to launch and open up infrastructure attacks on a worldwide scale. With the personal data of 7 million drivers and 50 million customers compromised, the fallout was significant not only for Uber, but also the world of data security was significant.

Establish enterprise requirements for securing secrets and credentials

Instead of struggling to consistently control and monitor secrets dispersed across multiple DevOps tools, a better approach to reducing risk and saving time is to implement a centralised secrets management system. The centralised secrets management platform can then be used to ensuring that users, whether human or machine, don’t see the actual credentials.

Adapt processes for application testing

With DevOps teams making multiple releases per day, security needs to implement new, automated approaches so as not to slow the process down. For example, security can develop automated, updated processes, such as a “break the build” approach.

Evaluate the results

In most cases, improving the security of DevOps environments happens through many incremental advances. Teams should highlight each success and then build and expand from them. For example, organisations can use metrics to show how much of the attack surface has been addressed and how effective controls are.

Newer and continuous approaches to testing are ultimately necessary to ensure that security is embedded in DevOps strategies. Development teams need to be trained in order to improve their security awareness and to determine how they can best work with security teams. At the same time, security personnel will benefit from learning how their role fits within the wider DevOps ecosystem. If these formerly disparate components can be brought together, an effective DevSecOps philosophy will follow as a matter of course.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Understanding Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

March 28, 202410 Mins Read

Decoding Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

March 28, 202411 Mins Read

Master Cloud Compliance Tools: Achieve Regulatory Success

March 28, 202411 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}