Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Study & Research - British Businesses Spreading Cryptocurrency Risk – 93% Of Companies Stockpiling Bitcoin Have Invested In Additional Digital Currencies
Study & Research

British Businesses Spreading Cryptocurrency Risk – 93% Of Companies Stockpiling Bitcoin Have Invested In Additional Digital Currencies

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamFebruary 14, 20186 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Bitcoin
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

~ Over half of companies with a ready stock of Bitcoin have sold off some of their supply to profit from soaring valuations ~

Today, new research suggests that half (50 per cent) of large UK businesses have built a stockpile of digital currency in case of a ransomware attack – and just seven per cent are only stockpiling Bitcoin. In fact, the vast majority (93 per cent) are spreading their cryptocurrency risk by investing in other digital currencies as well.

The research – commissioned by Citrix and carried out by OnePoll – quizzed 750 IT decision makers in companies with 250 or more employees across the UK to uncover the extent to which large British businesses are accumulating stores of cryptocurrencies, the impact of the fluctuating price of Bitcoin and how organisations plan to keep these investments secure against cybercriminals. The research also considered whether the increasing use of cryptocurrencies led to business use-cases beyond paying cybercriminals to regain access to their data following a ransomware attack.

Diversifying cryptocurrency portfolios

The poll revealed that almost nine in 10 (88 per cent) responding large UK businesses, which keep a ready stockpile of digital currency, do stockpile Bitcoin. While Bitcoin has proven extremely popular, the vast majority of these companies have also invested in additional cryptocurrencies. More than half (54 per cent) have bought Litecoin but a significant proportion of these organisations have also invested in Ethereum (43 per cent), Ethereum Classic (33 per cent), Ripple (33 per cent) and Dash (29 per cent). In fact, just seven per cent of large UK businesses are choosing to accumulate Bitcoin only.

Bitcoin returns

While more UK companies are building a ready stockpile of digital currency – rising from 42 per cent in 2016 to 50 per cent – the number of Bitcoins kept on standby has remained largely consistent. Large UK businesses now stockpile an average of 24 Bitcoins – only one more than the 2016 average.

This apparent consistency in terms of amount of Bitcoin kept on standby may reflect many organisations’ decision to cash in on inflated prices to make a profit. The poll uncovered that more than half (57 per cent) of those British companies stockpiling Bitcoin have sold some of their supply to make a profit as the cryptocurrency’s value inflated. An additional two fifths (38 per cent) of these businesses are currently considering making a sale – leaving just five per cent choosing to keep all their Bitcoins.

 Securing Bitcoin

Almost two thirds (64 per cent) of those companies keeping a ready supply of Bitcoin believe that its inflated price has led cybercriminals to target their Bitcoin stockpile. In fact, large British businesses are very aware of the cyber threat to valuable Bitcoin wallets: only 5 per cent of organisations which stockpile the currency have not taken any steps to protect their Bitcoin reserves.

Of those which have made changes to secure their Bitcoin assets, more than half (52 per cent) have used specific back-up procedures. Other popular security measures include: using cold storage/offline storage (36 per cent), moving to multiple wallets (36 per cent), using a dedicated/hardened computer (35 per cent) and using dual control so multiple people are required to access the cryptocurrency (22 percent).

Crypto payments

Many large British businesses are stockpiling cryptocurrency with a view to using it for a number of use cases beyond paying a cyber ransom if required. In fact, just four per cent are building a ready supply of digital currencies specifically to pay ransom-demanding cyberattackers. The research found that two fifths (40 per cent) plan to use the currencies to pay providers, while one in three (32 per cent) are aiming to pay employees in a digital currency. Additional plans include using it together with smart contracts or other blockchain technologies (27 per cent), as part of fundraising (21 per cent) and to pay for training, R&D or other demonstrational activities (17 per cent).

Biggest concerns: value, internal policy and security

More organisations are investing in cryptocurrencies, yet its value is a key deterrent. More than a third of large UK businesses polled cite concerns that the digital currency will crash (35 per cent) and fluctuating prices (34 per cent) as factors that discourage them from stockpiling cryptocurrencies. Additionally, almost one in five (18 per cent) are concerned that the business will not be able to cash the cryptocurrency in when required.

Organisational policies and uncertainty are also holding companies back. One in three (33 per cent) admit that the fact they don’t have a policy on how to deal with digital currency as a type of company asset deters them from stockpiling a digital currency – while 31 per cent pinpoint the lack of an assigned budget to use to purchase digital currencies as a discouraging factor.

Security concerns are similarly rife. Almost one third (31 per cent) believe a stockpile of digital currency might make the business a target for cybercriminals while almost one in five (18 per cent) worry that it might put them at risk of insider theft. Additionally, while some companies keep cryptocurrency on the off chance they are required to pay a cyber ransom, one in ten (11 per cent) raised the concern that ransomware attackers may request payment in a different cryptocurrency – which the business does not stockpile – or potentially request payment in a national currency, e.g. dollars or pounds, instead.

Chris Mayers, chief security architect, Citrix, said:

 “Initially many organisations were treating ransomware as a cost of doing business – just like shrinkage and fraud in some sectors – and building a stockpile of cryptocurrency to cover potential cyber ransoms. Yet this is changing as companies begin to embrace its potential as a revenue driver, as well as an alternative means to pay for staff and services. As British companies continue to build and diversify their cryptocurrency portfolios, vital security measures must be put in place to protect these reserves and ensure they can be used for a growing range of business processes instead of falling into criminal hands through ransom or theft.

It is encouraging to see that organisations are aware of the need to protect cryptocurrencies, even though most of them have not yet put the full range of security measures into practice. With more than one cryptocurrency, and supporting diverse business needs, security becomes both more important and potentially more complex.  Organisations should adopt the same approach as they do for data and apps: simplify security by placing cryptocurrencies under centralised control with common policies and procedures, with robust defences. Cryptocurrencies must not be managed by ‘shadow IT’.”

[su_box title=”About Citrix” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″][short_info id=’71012′ desc=”true” all=”false”][/su_box]

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

December 18, 20255 Mins Read

What Happens When Devices Cross Borders? The Role of Geofencing in Global IT

August 7, 20256 Mins Read

The Evolving Importance of Identity Governance in FinTech

July 10, 20258 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}