Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Study & Research - Business Email Compromise (BEC) Attacks Reach 96 Percent Of Organisations
Study & Research

Business Email Compromise (BEC) Attacks Reach 96 Percent Of Organisations

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamJanuary 31, 20184 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

BEC runs rampant as conventional email security fails to detect display name deception;

Agari enhances its Enterprise Protect functionality to deliver advanced protection against BEC

 SAN MATEO, Calif. – Agari, a leading cybersecurity company, today published research revealing that 96 percent of organisations have received business email compromise (BEC) emails during the second half of 2017. The Agari “Business Email Compromise (BEC) Attack Trends Report” analyses more than one billion emails considered safe by conventional email security solutions, including Secure Email Gateways (SEG), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) and Targeted Attack Protection (TAP).

“Business email compromise is a particularly effective attack vector because its lack of payload makes it nearly impossible for conventional email security solutions to detect and prevent,” said Markus Jakobsson, chief scientist, Agari. “At its core, business email compromise is a social engineering attack that leverages familiarity, authority and trust, which can result in billions of dollars of losses to businesses.”

According to the FBI, BEC attacks were responsible for more than $5.3 billion in exposed losses between 2013 and 2016. BEC attacks leverage social engineering, impersonating trusted individuals, such as bosses and third-party vendors, to request wire payments or sensitive data such as W-2 tax forms. Social networks and free cloud email services make it simple for cybercriminals to identify their targets, create an email account that impersonates a trusted entity (CEO, brand, partner) and then create a believable con with personalised details to make these attacks successful.

Key findings of the Agari “Business Email Compromise (BEC) Attack Trends Report” include:

  • Nearly every organisation has received BEC attacks– Research reveals that 96 percent of organisations have been targeted by BEC attacks between June 2017 and December 2018. On average, organisations experienced 45 BEC attacks during this time.
  • BEC attacks manifest in a variety of forms – BEC attacks include display name deception, domain spoofing, and look-alike domains. However, BEC attacks function differently than phishing or spear-phishing attacks because there is no payload, such as a malicious attachment or a malicious URL.
  • Conventional security solutions are ineffective against BEC –As the last line of defense against advanced email-based attacks, Agari witnessed that 81 percent of BEC attackers used display name deception, 12 percent using domain spoofing and 7 percent used look-alike domains to impersonate a trusted party, without the SEG, ATP or TAP detecting it.

Conventional email security solutions, such as SEG, ATP and TAP attempt to detect attacks by monitoring for malicious payloads, attachments, URLs and other forms of known bad behavior. However, attackers can evade these protections by impersonating trusted individuals, partners or brands, while avoiding the use of malicious payloads.

“Business email compromise has become a pervasive threat that targets nearly every organisation, often slipping past conventional email security solutions undetected,” said Greg Temm, chief information risk officer, FS-ISAC. “BEC opens organisations up to financial losses and could put customers’ investments at risk. Urgently deploying effective security controls and educating employees are some of the best ways to deal with this type of attack.”

Agari Enterprise Protect uses multiple patented machine learning models that integrate identity mapping, trust models and behavioral analytics linking the Internet’s infrastructure, organisational and individual data to detect and prevent identity deception. Built against massive, Internet-scale data sets, including insights from over 2 trillion emails every year across 3 billion global inboxes. Based on identity intelligence, Agari can accurately detect and prevent all three forms of identity deception used by BEC attacks including domain spoofing, look-alike domains and display name deception.

As BEC attacks remain unchecked by conventional email security, Agari continues to enhance

Enterprise Protect to ensure customers are protected. The latest enhancements include:

  • Agari Advanced Display Name Protection– A new machine learning model integrates organisational data from Office 365 and Azure Active Directory to automatically block display name deception.
  • Rapid DMARC– Automatically authenticates inbound email claiming to be from an organisation’s internal domains to block spoofing attempts—regardless of whether the organisation has published a DMARC policy.
  • Search & Destroy – Microsoft Office 365 and Google G Suite administrators can rapidly search and delete emails that have already been delivered to user inboxes for breach prevention or copy emails for forensic analysis.

Download “Business Email Compromise (BEC) Attack Trends Report” at: http://www.agari.com/business-email-compromise-report/?utm_source=PR&utm_medium=PR

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

New Phishing Kit Starkiller Defeats Multi-Factor Authentication

February 23, 20264 Mins Read

ReliaQuest Uncovers Social Media Phishing Campaign Built on Trusted Tools

January 22, 20266 Mins Read

What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?

January 5, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}