Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Hackers Steal $60m Bitcoin From NiceHash
Articles

Hackers Steal $60m Bitcoin From NiceHash

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamDecember 11, 2017Updated:July 4, 20245 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

News broke yesterday that  “highly professional” hackers made off with around 4,700 Bitcoin from a leading mining service, a Bitcoin exchange has said.The value of Bitcoin is currently extremely volatile, but at the time of writing, the amount stolen was worth approximately $80m. IT security experts commented below.

Dr. Richard Ford, Chief Scientist at Forcepoint:

“Two Bitcoin thefts – Nicehash and the e-commerce driven Quant malware exploit – in the last four days and thieves are just getting started. In Forcepoint’s 2018 Security Predictions, we highlighted the risk of attacks against cryptocurrency. As Bitcoin values soar beyond US$15,000, its attractiveness to attackers will increase in proportion, both to hackers and nation-state level attacks.

While the Bitcoin valuation is incredibly tantalizing, investors need to recognize that cryptocurrencies are not magic – they can be stolen just like regular money, and are comparatively easy to launder. So, how can you protect a cryptocurrency renowned for its anonymity? Users and companies need to take precautions commensurate with the value of the as set they are protecting, implementing not only traditional security but also watching out for malicious insiders or compromised third-party partners  who have access to a vast pool of liquid assets. Our prediction remains: we’re just seeing the beginning of these attacks – there will be many more to come in 2018.”

2018 Prediction – Cryptocurrencies

Attackers will target vulnerabilities in systems which implement blockchain technology.

The Rise of Cryptocurrency Hacks: As cryptocurrencies grow in importance, including as a method of extracting revenue from cybercrime, Forcepoint predicts that the systems surrounding such currencies will increasingly come under attack. We expect to see an increasing amount of malware targeting user credentials of cryptocurrency exchanges, and that cybercriminals will turn their attention to vulnerabilities in systems relying on blockchain-based technologies.

Tristan Liverpool, Director of Systems Engineering at F5 Networks:

“At a time of widespread uncertainty and distrust in many areas of the digital economy, Blockchain’s central promise of ultra-secure measures for certainty and authenticity is an incredibly compelling proposition. However, for many experts, Blockchain continues to have a range of limitations. Analysis from the Open Data Institute (ODI) has highlighted a range of potential security stumbling blocks, including interoperability, privacy issues and the need to find information within the Blockchain.

“In addition, many application developers are still failing to write APIs with security embedded, which puts both the application and the underlying data at risk. Better code means better confidence as the need for greater transparency, combined with emerging business models built on blockchain technology, will drive more organisations to safeguard data and improve overall application security standards.

“Users of Bitcoin should be well advised to do their due diligence before making investments. Having a secure and versatile application program interface (API) will give users complete control and flexibility over the performance and integrity of vital applications. In the wake of recent high-profile breaches, now is the time for users to protect their passwords and be vigilant with on-line behaviour.”

Matt Walmsley, EMEA Director at Vectra:

 “Bank heist takes new height as hackers turn to the banks’ own tools to steal their money. This NiceHash attack is reminiscent of the Carbanak heist, the biggest online robbery. For an environment like NiceHash, which has an extremely challenging attack surface, the most important security controls are ones that monitor internal traffic. It flags any misuse of administrative credentials and administrative protocols, in addition to reconnaissance behaviours and the staged transfer of data through jump hosts.

“If you are using bitcoin, it is important to remember that exchanges are like not banks and therefore are not subject to the same cybersecurity regulations like those defined by State of New York for any institution operating in the state. If you are risk averse, transfer deposits made to your Bitcoin wallet to a hard currency account with a bank.

“While a bank can be hacked too, financial services firms demonstrate the lowest rates of attacker behaviours per 1,000 devices monitored, according to the 2016 Attacker Behaviour Industry Report. This is most likely due to their investment in cybersecurity controls and security personnel. However, many exchanges may limit the amount you can transfer in one instance and you may not be able to empty your account, so buyers beware.”

Igal Zeifman, Security Evangelist at Imperva Incapsula: 

“As a rule, extortionists and other cybercriminals are commonly drawn to successful online industries, especially emerging ones that are less likely to be well-protected.

Attackers can make a lot of money when attacking crypto exchanges due to factors such as the anonymity of the cryptocurrencies, hence the ability to “get rid” of the stolen goods with limited risk.

In Imperva’s latest DDoS Report we discovered that  73.9 percent of all bitcoin exchanges and related sites on the Imperva Incapsula service were attacked in Q3 2017. As a result, the relatively small and young industry made it into the top-10 most attacked industries this quarter. The DDoS attacks we mitigated could have been attempts to manipulate the price of bitcoin and other cryptocurrency, something we know offenders had tried in the past.”

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

AppSec is dead, long live AI security

April 29, 20265 Mins Read

Managing App Access on Frontline Devices in an Always-On World

March 9, 20264 Mins Read

OWASP Top 10 2025: New Enemies, Old Foes, and an Approach to Vulnerability Remediation That Must Evolve

January 22, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}