Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Me, Myself And I: Protecting Consumer Identities
Articles

Me, Myself And I: Protecting Consumer Identities

David OrmeBy David OrmeJuly 9, 2019Updated:July 16, 20214 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

The sustained popularity of social media has meant that many of us are happy to make our online identity a digital reflection of our true selves. However, by putting every aspect of our lives online – from where we holiday to what we had for lunch, even our birthdays, which are often used as a password – our identity is easier to steal than ever before. 

While consumers may be willing to share information online, this attitude changes when it comes to protecting what we handover to companies. In fact, three quarters (75%) of consumers in a recent IDEX Biometrics ASA survey said they are concerned about the security of their personal information once it has been shared. Clearly, more work needs to be done to redress the balance. Consumers need to be given the right means to protect their identity without needing to censor what is shared online. In fact, 59% would feel more secure if their personal information was protected by their fingerprint for authentication instead of PINs and passwords, which may be stored in central databases and become vulnerable to cybercriminals. The time has come for consumers to stop having to use their personal information to prove who they are. 

In an era of multiple authentication methods – ranging from PINs and passwords to facial recognition – it can be a challenge for consumers to know which one is the most secure and will often resort to the easiest option available. Biometric authentication with fingerprints offers the safest and most convenient solution, as fingerprints are unique – even between identical twins. They can’t be guessed or broken by a brute force attack. 

The idea of collating all our data into Government ID cards has been mooted for decades, but this would be much more practical if they could be properly secured. Introducing fingerprint authentication to these ID cards or even driver’s license cards is one such way to increase security and protect our identity, both on and offline. Removing the need to use personal information that is also shared all over the internet to prove someone is who they say they are. 

 Securing identities, not data 

According to our study, more than half of consumers believe biometric fingerprint authentication would keep their information more secure; 53% stated it is the single most convenient way of proving their identity today. In contrast, nearly two-thirds (63%) say they are most concerned about potential identity theft when they share their mother’s maiden name. With these details often openly shared online, it does not take much for criminals to build a fraudulent identity, making the security of every piece of sensitive information crucial. This data can be pieced together to form a single identity and impact our entire lives – from compromising sensitive health records to bank account details. 

To allay these fears, consumers are now demanding more secure means of authentication to prove their identity. With fingerprint authentication tied to our identities, consumers can avoid having to share their personal information in the first place. For instance, instead of using the place they were born, their first pets name or their mother’s maiden name to match a pre-set response, consumers could use biometric identity authentication to securely and seamlessly prove who they physically are. 

Biometric identities 

With identity security of more importance to consumers than ever before, many countries are now realising the importance of fingerprint authentication in their national ID systems. In April 2018, the European Commission voted to include fingerprints on all government identity cards in the EU, noting that these enhanced biometric cards will increase security standards and make it harder for cybercriminals to steal identities across Europe. Beyond that, biometric ID cards with a fingerprint sensor can make it far easier for the cardholder to move through airport borders or use government systems, banks and healthcare. 

Whether we remain in the EU or not, the UK Government needs to make progressive steps to keep identities secure and as a simple, secure and personal form of authentication, biometric fingerprint ID cards will go a long way to regaining consumer confidence in the security of their identity. As the decade draws to a close, we should expect to see biometric fingerprint authentication become more widely recognised and implemented. 

David Orme

Executive and Board level Management executive with a proven track record of business growth and delivering exceptional financial performance. Skilled in Business Development, Product Management (B2C), Strategy (New Business Development, payment processing, identity verification, card issuing/less payments), and Business Strategy technology. I have strong commercial, analytical and financial skills backed up by more than several years' experience gained within large corporates and FTSE 100 companies

  • David Orme
    Weary Eyes And Fictitious Faces: Why Fingerprints Are Best For Biometric Authentication
  • David Orme
    Fingerprint Biometrics As The Future Of Retail
  • David Orme
    The Role Of Biometrics In A Post-GDPR World
  • David Orme
    Access Control — Why Fingerprints Are Better Than Keys

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

December 18, 20255 Mins Read

What Happens When Devices Cross Borders? The Role of Geofencing in Global IT

August 7, 20256 Mins Read

The Evolving Importance of Identity Governance in FinTech

July 10, 20258 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}