Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - 8 of the Largest Data Breaches of All Time
Articles

8 of the Largest Data Breaches of All Time

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamJanuary 26, 2016Updated:January 27, 20166 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
8 of the Largest Data Breaches of All Time
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

According to the ITRC (Identity Theft Resource Center), there have been 5,754 data breaches between November 2005 and November 2015 that have exposed 856,548,312 records. According to their data, there were 783 breaches in 2014, the largest number of data breaches in a single year to date. ITRC data also indicated that 29% of breaches involved hacking incidents in 2014, compared to just 14.1% in 2007. This shows an upward trend in the number of data breaches resulting from an outside cyber-attack. Although this data includes a comprehensive list of data breaches, whether large-scale or small, there are a few that stand out from the rest as some of the worst data breaches in history in terms of resulting costs and the number of records compromised. Below is a list of 8 of the worst breaches in history that highlights the cause of the breach and the effects on the public and business sectors.

  1. TJX – 2003

A hacker managed to infiltrate TJX chains, including Marshalls and TJ Maxx, and stole 45.7 million customer credit card and debit card numbers. Although not thought to be responsible for the hack itself, a group of people in Florida were charged for buying customer credit card data from the hackers and then used that data to purchase $1 million dollars’ worth of electronic goods and jewelry from Walmart. This breach is still considered one of the biggest retail data breaches of all time.

  1. Hannaford Brothers – 2013

Hackers managed to steal 4.2 million credit and debit card numbers within 3 months from 300 Hannaford stores, a large supermarket retailer. Hackers collected customer data via malware uploaded to Hannaford servers. The malware could intercept customer data during transactions, which was then used in over 2,000 cases of international customer fraud.

  1. Target – 2013

In order to gain access to customer credit and debit card numbers, hackers installed malicious software on POS systems in Target stores in self-checkout lanes. The card-skimming malware compromised the identities of 70 million customers and 40 million credit and debit cards. The same malware was later found in the Home Depot breach referenced below.

  1. Home Depot – 2014

A security breach that attacked Home Depot’s payment terminals affected 56 million credit and debit card numbers. The Ponemon institute estimated a loss of $194 per customer record compromised due to re-issuance costs and any resulting credit card fraud. For example, protection from identity theft through Experian is $14.95 per month. For this specific breach, that would amount in $837.2 million in costs related to fraud monitoring, which is often offered in the wake of a breach in order to protect victims from identity theft. Hackers first gained access to Home Depot’s systems through stolen vendor login credentials. Once the credentials were compromised, they installed malware on Home Depot’s payment systems that allowed them to collect consumer credit and debit card data.

  1. Ebay – 2014

Between February and March of 2014, Ebay requested that 145 million users change their account passwords due to a breach that compromised encrypted passwords along with other personal information. Like many of the other breaches included in this post, hackers gained access to Ebay accounts through stolen login credentials. The credentials did not come from customers themselves but instead from Ebay employees. In this particular breach, user payment information via PayPal was safe since it was encrypted; users were only asked to change their passwords as a precautionary measure.

  1. JP Morgan Chase – 2014

In 2014, a cyber-attack aimed at JP Morgan Chase compromised 83 million household and business accounts that included personal information such as names, email addresses, and phone numbers. The attack was said to impact two-thirds of all American households, making this breach one of the largest in history. A little less than a year later, four men were indicted for the attack on JP Morgan Chase as well as several other financial institutions with charges including securities and wire fraud, money laundering, and identity theft. The men made over $100 million through the scheme. In some instances, login credentials were obtained through tricking users and then used to access customer information. Hackers also exploited the Heartbleed bug in this breach, a vulnerability in OpenSSL that allowed hackers to steal information that is normally encrypted.

  1. Sony Pictures – 2014

Analysts believe that the Sony breach began with a series of phishing attacks targeted at Sony employees. These phishing attacks worked by convincing employees to download malicious email attachments or visit websites that would introduce malware to their systems. This type of attack used social engineering, where phishing emails appeared to be from someone the employees knew, thus tricking them into trusting its source. Hackers then used Sony employee login credentials to breach Sony’s network. Over 100 terabytes of data was stolen and monetary damages are estimated to be over $100 million.

  1. Anthem – 2015

In February of 2015, hackers broke into Anthem’s servers and stole up to 80 million records. The healthcare giant is the parent company of several well-known healthcare providers including Blue Cross and Blue Shield. The attack began with phishing emails sent to five employees who were tricked into downloading a Trojan with keylogger software that enabled the attackers to obtain passwords for accessing the unencrypted data. This breach was particularly devastating because it included the theft of millions of medical records thought to be worth 10 times the amount of credit card data. It is suspected that the stolen health records will be sold on the black market in the future.

References:

  1. NBC News Reference
  2. Network World Reference
  3. Tripwire Reference
  4. Krebs on Security Resource
  5. Forbes Reference
  6. USA Today Reference
  7. Washington Post Reference
  8. Wired Reference

[su_box title=”About OPSWAT” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″]OPSWATOPSWAT is a San Francisco based software company that provides solutions to secure and manage IT infrastructure. Founded in 2002, OPSWAT delivers solutions and technologies that protect devices and help secure digital data flow. OPSWAT’s intuitive applications and comprehensive development kits are deployed by SMB, enterprise and OEM customers to more than 100 million endpoints worldwide.[/su_box]

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

New Phishing Kit Starkiller Defeats Multi-Factor Authentication

February 23, 20264 Mins Read

ReliaQuest Uncovers Social Media Phishing Campaign Built on Trusted Tools

January 22, 20266 Mins Read

What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?

January 5, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}